> > She feels bad, her life is ruined; yes we all know that. What I want to know, and what I was hoping that the interviewer would get out of her, is what she did to an otherwise law-abiding cardiologist that contributed to him committing the most appalling murders in the history of Quebec. Does she feel any guilt for that? And what about her violation of her vows of marriage and of her commitment to her family?
>
>
>
> What DSG fails to understand is that there is a distinction between being a good husband or wife and being a good parent. According to DSG, the fact that Isabelle failed to honour her marriage vows contributed awaken the monster within Guy.
>
> DSG, half of the married couples eventually divorce in Quebec nowadays. Reasons for breaking up include infidelity. The message that you are sending is that it is legitimate to commit the most atrocious crime once your spouse cheated on you. What you say is that if you cheat on your spouse, you should be the one feeling guilty and taking responsibility for the actions committed by your cheated spouse. There is an explication for these crimes and this singular explication is Isabelle’s behaviour. You do not address the question of Guy's failure to feel guilty! This is a scary thought for a good percentage of the Quebec kids. Yes, you would fit in Afghanistan, along with Shafia and friends. Had Isabelle not cheated on Guy, would he still have committed these crimes? According to the court, he is a crazy fellow. So any event likely to disturb his zone of emotional comfort could have triggered madness. Yes, any event. Because nobody could foresee it!

You and Me completely misunderstood my point. I repeat: there is no justification for what Guy did, the defences at his disposal should be abolished from the criminal code, and if anyone deserves to be stoned to death it is him. I complained about the interview because I didn't want to hear about her misery. What I want to know is what the jury knew, no more no less. There was something in her actions that led to a verdict that left a bad taste in mouths of Quebecers. The interviewer had his chance to get answers for us, and he missed it.

> > She feels bad, her life is ruined; yes we all know that. What I want to know, and what I was hoping that the interviewer would get out of her, is what she did to an otherwise law-abiding cardiologist that contributed to him committing the most appalling murders in the history of Quebec. Does she feel any guilt for that? And what about her violation of her vows of marriage and of her commitment to her family?
> >
> > Instead she went on and on how our penal system is flawed by allowing murders to plead defence’s such as those used by Guy. And what about the flaws in our marital laws that renders a man a weekend dad while his friend, who seduced his wife, bounces his kids on his knees the rest of the week? Do you think that the institution of marriage is flawed too, Isabelle?
> >
> > And my favourite quote is that she is against the death penalty because everyone can be rehabilitated. Is that so? So what makes her so sure that her husband is not rehabilitated now?
> >
> > Don’t get me wrong: the only way that I would feel any sense of justice in this matter is if they torture Guy into madness. But justice for Isabelle would be to make sure that she is never again given the responsibility of being a mother.
>
> Wow, you would fit right in in ...in Afghanistan,maybe she should be stoned. Your comment puts blame on her for the horrible crime of a man. Imagine if we denied fathers any parental rights because of infdelity. She did the right thing and left him instead of blatently lying to him every day...

Why is it the men who killed their kids after learning that their wife cheated? When a man cheats on his wife, the wife usually moves on and so does the man by usually leaving the wife and kids behind. The real problem is that most men cannot deal with the situation and should learn to get help!